The Merriam Collection
Artifact Infotainment Department
The Lockesburg Cache
By Larry and Chris Merriam
This updated article is based off our work that was published in Prehistoric American Vol XLI Number 3 2007.
In 1934 Robert Bell and his friend Chuck Aronhalt made a return trip from their homes in Marion, Ohio, to archaeological sites in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Between March 26 and April 16 of that year they traveled to the lockesburg Mound group in southwestern Arkansas. There, they ran across some old friends, Ike Dowell and Charlie Banks. They knew the two men from a meeting a year earlier at the Spiro Mound site in Oklahoma. There the two men had been working for Joe Balloon of Dardanelle, Arkansas, who had leased the far southeast cone of that mound for digging. That effort at Spiro had proven unsuccessful and the effort had been abandoned. (Later in the fall of 1933 a group of 6 men had leased the rest of the Spiro Mound for digging and had been recovering incredible artifacts.)
Since his unsuccessful efforts at Spiro, Joe Balloon had obtained a lease to dig at the lockesburg site. The lockesburg site would later become famous for its outstanding large blades, but in 1934 the site was relatively unknown. The largest mound at the site was said to contain no significant artifacts. (Figure 1 is a picture of the big mound taken in 1934.) The men had been digging at a smaller mound when Bell arrived. The diggers had uncovered a cache of eight blades. (Figure 2 is a photo of the area where the cache was found.) The top seven blades were all broken but when they uncovered the bottom blade it was intact! It was a wide blade of incredible thinness. The blade measured 9 long, 3 & 3/8 wide and as thin as 3/32 at one point. This is an astonishing width-to-thickness ratio of over 42 to 1. (Figure 3 is a tri-fold image of this blade.)
Robert Bell bought the cache from Joe Balloon. It was during the Depression and Bell did not have a lot of money. Therefore, he restored the broken blades and sold them to recover his expenses in order that he could keep the unbroken blade. (Figure 4 shows two of the broken blades after restoration.) Unfortunately, we dont know the whereabouts of all seven of the broken blades, but the eighth blade stayed in Bells collection for 72 years. It remains in his familys possession to this day.
We have discovered all but one of the killed blades from the cache. We know they are from the cache because Dr. Bell kept a catalog of artifacts in the family collection including their cost. The Bell-lockesburg blade is item number 150. In his inventory items 150 through 157 are listed at a cost of $10 each. Items prior to 150 and after 157 are listed at values other than $10; therefore, we can conclude that items 151 through 157 represent the broken blades from the cache. Bobbie Onken had two blades he obtained from Earl Townsend, who had purchased the Bell collection. Those blades have Bells inventory numbers 151 and 153. A third blade, # 156, was in the Roy Hathcock collection and was also obtained from Earl Townsend. We have shown photographs of the three blades to knowledgeable Arkansas collectors who are experts on lockesburg. They agree that the blades are forms found at lockesburg and appear to be from that site.
Of all the flint pieces Robert Bell saw in his lifetime, what makes blade 150 so special? The Bell-lockesburg Blade is a masterpiece, a work of art. It is made from a translucent Edwards chert. The dark chocolate brown color is typical for lockesburg pieces and may reflect patination created by the soil conditions at the site. When illuminated by backlight, the blade shows a warm golden glow. It is so thin and translucent; you can actually read Bells inventory number on one side through the piece from the reverse side! The high quality of the chert allowed removal of the broad shallow flakes that are necessary to create the unbelievable thinness of the blade.
Knappers weve talked to who have seen the blade do not know what techniques were used to achieve this ultra-thinness. The flakes actually dive towards the center of the blade such that the thinnest spots are near the center of the blade. There are examples of this flaking technology in Caddoan blades where the flake actually broke through to the other side, creating a hole in the center of the piece.
At this time, the best-known Caddoan ultra-thin blade is the Sweetwater Biface, found in 1986 by Roland Kramer. It was found in Nolan County, Texas, near the town of Sweetwater, on the surface in a gully. It measures 9 7/16 x 3 3/8 and is only 3/16 at the thickest spot. It was originally curated by Charley Shewey and is now in The Museum of Natve American History.
Peter Bostrum of Lithic Casting Lab has created a museum-quality cast of the Sweetwater Biface. Peter reports the blade thickness ranges from 1/16 to 5/32. These values are very comparable to the Bell-lockesburg Blade. A side-by-side comparison of the Bostrum cast of the Sweetwater Biface and the Bell-lockesburg Blade illustrates the similarities in the flaking style. In fact, these are so striking it is easy for one to speculate that they were knapped by the same maker. The Sweetwater Biface is slightly longer than the Bell-lockesburg Blade. It is also made of Edwards chert but a different variety than the Bell-lockesburg Blade and is not translucent. The two blades represent a pinnacle in flint knapping art.
Figure 1.) The Big Mound at lockesburg: This photo was taken in 1934 and shows the largest mound at lockesburg. Dr. Bell reported that there were no artifacts found in this mound. (Photograph by Robert E. Bell.)
Figure 2.) Mound containing the Bell-lockesburg Blade cache. This photo shows the area of the site where the Bell Blade was uncovered. The man on the left is one of the diggers, either Ike Dowell or Charlie Banks. The man on the right is Chuck Aronhalt, Robert Bells friend from Marion, Ohio. (Photograph by Robert E. Bell.)
Figure 3.) Tri-fold picture of the Bell Blade. This figure shows three views of the Bell Blade in one photo. The blade is 9 x 3 3/8 x 3/32. (Photographs by Chris Merriam.)
(This photograph was used for a
short article in
Central States Archaeological Journal vol.55 oct 2008 Number 4 Arkansas 50th Anniversary Edition, pg. 234)
Figure 4.) Two restored blades from the cache. In this picture are two of the seven killed blades found with the Bell Blade. In this photo the blades have been restored. (Photograph by Robert E. Bell.)
These two have been found since this article was written, new photos below.
I discovered this one for sale on Arrowheadology.
My father found this blade in the Townsend Auction Part 2 June 23rd, 2012
Figure 5.) Backlit view of the Bell-lockesburg Blade. The golden glow of the Bell Blade when backlit is shown in this picture. Just to the right of the three black spots at the base of the blade it is possible to read Robert E. Bells inventory number that is written on the other side of the blade. This illustrates the incredible thinness and transparency of the artifact. (Photograph by Chris Merriam.)
Figure 8.) Side-by-side view of the Sweetwater Biface and the Bell Blade. This picture shows Peter Bostroms cast of the Sweetwater Biface and the Bell Blade in a side-by-side comparison. The light gray blade on the left is the cast and the darker brown Bell Blade is on the right in each photo. The flaking style on both pieces is very similar. Visit Mr. Bostrums website at Lithiccastinglab.com to view color pictures of the Sweetwater blade. (Photograph by Chris Merriam.)
New photos of these two
side by side, but the cast of the Sweewater Biface
shows the flaking better so I have included those original photos above.
Here is a video of the Sweetwater Biface on display at
The Museum of Native American History.
And last but not least a group photo of the seven we have identified.
The three longest blades in this photo can be see in Earl Townsend Jr. Collection, featured in Legends of Prehistoric Art Vol. 1 on page 225
The Artifact Room
About.....Make a Purchase
Site Map.....On Hold